Schuyler Stacy2026-06-16

제목을 렌더링하는 AI 영화 포스터 만드는 방법 (2026)

AI 영화 포스터 만드는 방법: 바로 붙여 넣을 수 있는 장르별 프롬프트, 적절한 2:3 크기, 선명한 제목을 위한 2단계 해결법, 그리고 배치 처리를 위한 API 코드.

제목을 렌더링하는 AI 영화 포스터 만드는 방법 (2026)

AI 영화 포스터에서 어려운 부분은 그림이 아닙니다. 어떤 이미지 모델이든 약 20초면 분위기 있는 주인공 샷을 만들어 줍니다. 진짜 어려운 부분은 포스터처럼 보이게 만드는 모든 요소입니다. 엉망이 되지 않은 제목, 실제로 읽을 수 있는 태그라인, 하단의 크레딧 블록, 정사각형이 아닌 실제 영화 포스터 같은 프레임이 필요합니다. 주말 동안 다섯 가지 장르로 포스터를 생성해 보니, 거의 모든 실패는 세 가지 중 하나로 귀결되었습니다 — 잘못된 비율, 텍스트를 넣을 공간 부족, 또는 모델에게 한 번에 그림과 함께 긴 타이포그래피 문단까지 그리도록 요청한 경우였습니다.

이 가이드는 이 세 가지 문제를 해결합니다. 장르별로 복사해 붙여 넣을 수 있는 프롬프트, 직접 찍은 사진을 포스터로 바꾸는 프롬프트 모음, 제목을 선명하게 만드는 2단계 방법, 그리고 다섯 장이 아니라 쉰 장을 만들고 싶을 때 사용할 수 있는 실행 가능한 API 호출까지 제공합니다. 두 모델이 작업을 나눠 맡습니다. gpt-image-2 는 정밀하고 다국어 텍스트를, Gemini 3 Pro Image (많은 사람이 Nano Banana Pro라고 부르는 모델)는 스타일과 4K 출력을 담당합니다. 두 모델 모두 GPTProto를 통해 실행되므로, 한 줄만 바꾸면 모델을 전환할 수 있습니다.

 

목차

The anatomy of a poster prompt

A poster has to land in about one second, so a prompt that works names four things and nothing more: one hero subject, a genre and mood, the lighting, and where the text goes. That last one is the part people skip. If you don't tell the model to leave space, it fills the frame edge to edge and you're left with nowhere to put the title that doesn't cover a face.

A structure that holds up: [subject + action] + [genre and mood] + [lighting and lens] + [color grade] + [explicit empty space for the title and credits] + [aspect ratio]. Keep it to a few sentences. Longer prompts don't buy you a better poster — they give the model more chances to garble the text.

One line to remember: describe the shot, then tell the model where to leave the canvas blank.

Copy-paste prompts by genre

Each of these is a text-to-image prompt. They reserve space for the title on purpose and ask for a 2:3 frame — the shape of a real one-sheet. Run them on Gemini 3 Pro Image for the richest style, or on gpt-image-2 if you already know the title text will be heavy.

Action

A lone special-forces operative sprinting across a collapsing rooftop at golden hour, dust and debris frozen mid-air, helicopters circling a smoke-filled sky, shot on a 35mm anamorphic lens, strong rim light, teal-and-orange grade, hyper-detailed and cinematic. Leave the top third clean for a bold metallic title and keep the bottom 15% darker for a credits block. Portrait one-sheet, 2:3.

Horror

A dim farmhouse hallway at night seen through a doorway, a single out-of-focus figure standing far at the end, faint moonlight, heavy film grain, desaturated greens and sickly yellows, deep shadows swallowing the edges, 50mm, unsettling negative space. Keep the upper area empty for a thin serif title and a short tagline. Portrait one-sheet, 2:3.

Sci-fi

A lone figure on a rooftop overlooking a neon megacity at night, towering holographic billboards, flying vehicles trailing light, volumetric fog, cyan-and-magenta palette, wet reflective surfaces, ultra-wide cinematic composition. Reserve clear space at top center for a wide futuristic title and the bottom edge for credits. Portrait one-sheet, 2:3.

Romance

Two people standing close under string lights on a rain-slick city street at dusk, warm soft bokeh, gentle backlight, shallow depth of field, film-photography color, intimate and quiet. Leave generous empty sky at the top for an elegant script title and room at the base for a single tagline. Portrait one-sheet, 2:3.

Animated

A brave young inventor and a small round robot companion on a grassy hilltop at sunrise, lush stylized 3D animated-film look, soft global illumination, warm saturated colors, expressive faces, family-adventure tone. Keep the top of the sky open for a large rounded title and the bottom for a release-date strip. Portrait one-sheet, 2:3.

Keep the animated look generic, as above. Asking for a specific studio's house style or characters by name walks you into trademark territory you don't want a commercial poster standing on.

Turn your own photo into a poster

The most-searched version of this is "put me on the poster." That's an image-edit job: you pass a photo as a reference and the model composes the poster around it while holding the likeness. Use your own photo, or a fictional character you have the rights to — not a real celebrity, and not a trademarked character. Putting someone else's face on a poster without consent is the one shortcut here that can actually get you in trouble.

Paste these into an image-edit model with your photo attached:

Action lead

Using the uploaded photo of me as the lead, build a cinematic action one-sheet: a low-angle hero pose at the center, golden-hour rim lighting, smoke and embers behind, teal-and-orange grade. Keep my face and likeness intact. Leave the top third empty for a title. Portrait, 2:3.

Romance, two leads (attach two photos)

Using the two uploaded photos as the two leads, compose a romance poster: the two faces close together, warm light, soft bokeh of a city street at dusk behind them. Preserve both likenesses. Leave space at the top for a script title and a tagline at the bottom. Portrait, 2:3.

Horror solo

Turn the uploaded portrait into the lead of a horror one-sheet: half the face in shadow, cold moonlight, desaturated palette, heavy grain, an empty hallway behind. Keep the likeness. Reserve the upper area for a thin title. Portrait, 2:3.

Want to try these without writing code? Run them on the gpt-image-2 image-edit page or the Gemini 3 Pro Image image-edit page, or skip straight to the finished AI Movie Poster Maker.

Which model: text or style

The two models split cleanly along one line — text precision versus everything else.

gpt-image-2 renders in-image text more accurately than anything else I tested, including dense credit blocks and non-Latin scripts. If your title is in Japanese or Chinese, this is the one. It bills by token ($6.4 per 1M input, $24 per 1M output on GPT Proto), so a single high-quality large poster costs more than a flat per-image model would, and the bill climbs with size and quality.

Gemini 3 Pro Image leans the other way: stronger photoreal style, better character consistency across a series, output up to 4K, and a flat $0.0804 per image. That predictability is the point when you're running a batch.

  gpt-image-2 Gemini 3 Pro Image (Nano Banana Pro)
Best at Precise, multilingual in-image text; complex layouts Photoreal style, character consistency across a series
Max resolution Up to a 3840px edge Up to 4K (3392×5056 at 2:3)
Pricing on GPT Proto Token-based: $6.4 / 1M input, $24 / 1M output Flat $0.0804 per image
Reach for it when The title is dense or non-Latin and must be exact You want the art, 4K output, or a large batch

In practice: build the art and style on Gemini 3 Pro Image, and if the title won't come out clean — or you need a second language — run a precise-text pass on gpt-image-2. The trade-off is real. gpt-image-2's accuracy costs more per image, so don't reach for it until the text actually needs it.

Get the proportions right

A theatrical one-sheet is 27×40 inches — a 2:3 ratio. Most prompt guides hand you square images, because that's the model default, and a square poster looks wrong the second you set it next to a real one. Set the shape explicitly.

On gpt-image-2, pass size as pixels: "1024x1536" for a quick 2:3, or larger for print — up to a 3840px long edge, both sides multiples of 16, aspect ratio no wider than 3:1.

On Gemini 3 Pro Image, set aspect_ratio to "2:3" and size to "4K", which gives you 3392×5056 — large enough to print. For social, 9:16 covers stories and 4:5 covers the feed.

The hard part: getting the title text sharp

This is the failure I hit most. Ask one prompt to paint a complex scene, a long title, a tagline, and a credits block, and the text is the first thing to break — letters dissolve, words misspell, kerning collapses. Both models render text far better than last year's diffusion models, but a dense block of typography in the same pass as detailed artwork is still where they crack.

The fix is to split it into two passes.

Pass one: generate the artwork with the title area left empty (every prompt above already does this). Pass two: send that image back through an image-edit call and ask only for the text — title, tagline, and credits, with the font and placement spelled out. Because the model is now editing rather than inventing the whole frame, the text lands clean far more often.

A pass-two image-edit call, using the pass-one image as input:

titled = generate(
    "openai/gpt-image-2/image-edit",
    {
        "prompt": (
            'Add the title "MIDNIGHT SIGNAL" in a bold condensed sans-serif '
            "across the empty top third, a smaller tagline just below it, and a "
            "credits block along the bottom edge. Do not change the rest of the image."
        ),
        "images": [poster["outputs"][0]],   # the pass-one image URL
        "size": "1024x1536",
        "quality": "high",
        "response_format": "url",
    },
)
print(titled["outputs"])

For a non-Latin title, run pass two on gpt-image-2 — its multilingual text rendering is the reason to pay the higher per-image rate. One line to remember: never make the model paint the picture and write the title in the same breath.

Mistakes to avoid

  • Cramming a complex scene, a long title, and several characters into one prompt. The text breaks first — split it into two passes.
  • Leaving no empty space. With nowhere reserved, the title lands across a face.
  • Generating a square. Posters are 2:3; set size 1024x1536 on gpt-image-2 or aspect_ratio 2:3 on Gemini 3 Pro Image.
  • Forgetting resolution. The default is around 1K — for print, pass a larger size explicitly.
  • Letting the URL expire. GPT Proto returns a temporary image URL, so download it right away or request b64_json instead.
  • Putting a real actor's face or a trademarked character in the prompt. Use your own photo or original characters; the legal exposure isn't worth it.

Do it via the API: make fifty, not five

Everything above works one poster at a time in a web tool. The reason to touch the API is volume: a different title for every film in a slate, five aspect ratios per poster, the same poster in three languages. GPT Proto runs both models through one async pattern — submit a request, get back a prediction id, poll until it's done. Set your key as an environment variable first (export GPTPROTO_API_KEY=sk-...) and never hard-code it.

A small helper that submits a job and waits for the result:

import os, time, requests

API_KEY = os.environ["GPTPROTO_API_KEY"]
BASE = "https://gptproto.com/api/v3"
HEADERS = {"Authorization": API_KEY, "Content-Type": "application/json"}

def generate(path, body):
    # submit the job
    r = requests.post(f"{BASE}/{path}", headers=HEADERS, json=body)
    r.raise_for_status()
    get_url = r.json()["data"]["urls"]["get"]
    # poll until the prediction finishes
    while True:
        data = requests.get(get_url, headers=HEADERS).json()["data"]
        if data["status"] in ("completed", "failed"):
            return data        # data["outputs"] holds the image URL(s)
        time.sleep(2)

Generate a poster with each model — same call, different body:

# gpt-image-2: pixel sizes + a quality level
poster = generate(
    "openai/gpt-image-2/text-to-image",
    {"prompt": PROMPT, "size": "1024x1536", "quality": "high", "response_format": "url"},
)

# Gemini 3 Pro Image: a size tier + an aspect ratio
poster = generate(
    "google/gemini-3-pro-image-preview/text-to-image",
    {"prompt": PROMPT, "size": "4K", "aspect_ratio": "2:3", "output_format": "png"},
)
print(poster["outputs"])

Batch a whole slate by looping over prompts:

genres = {"action": ACTION_PROMPT, "horror": HORROR_PROMPT, "scifi": SCIFI_PROMPT}

for name, prompt in genres.items():
    out = generate(
        "google/gemini-3-pro-image-preview/text-to-image",
        {"prompt": prompt, "size": "4K", "aspect_ratio": "2:3", "output_format": "png"},
    )
    print(name, out["outputs"])

Prefer cURL for a quick test:

curl --location 'https://gptproto.com/api/v3/openai/gpt-image-2/text-to-image' \
  --header 'Authorization: GPTPROTO_API_KEY' \
  --header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  --data '{"prompt":"<your poster prompt>","size":"1024x1536","quality":"high","response_format":"url"}'

The one gotcha: the two models take different size parameters on the same endpoint. gpt-image-2 wants a pixel size and a quality level; Gemini 3 Pro Image wants a size tier (1K/2K/4K) and an aspect_ratio. Same auth, same polling, different body. (These calls mirror GPT Proto's documented request shape; check the model pages for the current parameter list before a production run.)

Try it

Want to see it work before writing any code? Open the AI Movie Poster Maker, or run a prompt in the playground on the gpt-image-2 and Gemini 3 Pro Image model pages. When you're ready to batch, the calls above scale to as many posters as you need — and the pricing page shows exactly what each run costs.

크리에이티브 스튜디오

프로덕션 API로 이미지, 영상 등을 생성해 보세요.

만들기 시작하기
크리에이티브 스튜디오
관련 모델
모든 모델
OpenAI
20% OFF
Google
40% OFF
Claude
20% OFF
Google
40% OFF

FAQ

무료인가요?

정액 무료 요금제는 없습니다. 두 모델 모두 사용량에 따라 과금됩니다. gpt-image-2는 토큰 기준이고 Gemini 3 Pro Image는 이미지당 $0.0804입니다. 최신 요금은 Model 페이지에서 확인할 수 있습니다.

제목 텍스트를 가장 잘 처리하는 모델은 무엇인가요?

특히 복잡하거나 비라틴 문자로 된 텍스트에는 gpt-image-2가 적합합니다.

인쇄에는 어떤 크기를 사용해야 하나요?

가능한 가장 큰 해상도의 2:3을 사용하세요. Gemini 3 Pro Image에서는 4K(3392×5056), gpt-image-2에서는 긴 변 최대 3840px까지 지원합니다.

녹아내린 것처럼 보이지 않는 정확한 제목을 어떻게 추가하나요?

먼저 제목 영역을 비워 둔 채 아트를 생성한 다음, 두 번째 이미지 편집 패스에서 텍스트를 추가하세요.

내 사진으로 포스터를 만들 수 있나요?

네. 이미지 편집 호출에 자신의 사진을 업로드하세요. 동의 없이 다른 실제 인물의 사진을 사용하지 말고, 유명인도 피하세요.

다른 언어로도 포스터를 만들 수 있나요?

네. 텍스트 패스에는 gpt-image-2를 사용하세요.
wan.2.2: 생성형 비디오의 표준

wan.2.2: 생성형 비디오의 표준

TL;DR The wan.2.2 model prioritizes visual integrity and strict prompt adherence over raw generation speed. It requires substantial hardware but rewards creators with reliable, artifact-free AI video output. Generative video models often prioritize speed at the expense of visual coherence. You type a detailed scene description, wait a few minutes, and receive a clip filled with warped faces and unnatural motion. The creators behind wan.2.2 took a different approach. They built a system that respects the aesthetic details of your source material and carefully calculates motion vectors to prevent pixel drift. Running this architecture natively requires serious computing power. You will need a top-tier GPU to process the parameters efficiently, which is why many professionals offload the heavy lifting to robust APIs. By stepping away from local hardware limits, you can integrate tools like ComfyUI, SVI Pro, and PainterI2V to force the model to behave exactly how you envision. Achieving cinematic results means looking past the initial five-second output constraint. Chaining clips together and utilizing native frame interpolation allows you to construct cohesive, high-resolution sequences that actually match your initial text prompts.

Schuyler Stacy | 2026-03-02

Veo 3 요금: Google의 AI 비디오 생성기 비용 2026 완벽 가이드

Veo 3 요금: Google의 AI 비디오 생성기 비용 2026 완벽 가이드

TL;DR Google Veo 3 요금은 Pro(제한된 생성 횟수) 월 $19.99, Ultra(대량 생성) 월 $249.99입니다. API 요금은 모델 버전과 오디오 여부에 따라 초당 $0.10~$0.40입니다.

Tiffany Layne | 2026-02-03

Qwen Image Edit: 모든 GPU에서 모델 최적화

Qwen Image Edit: 모든 GPU에서 모델 최적화

요약 qwen image edit 에코시스템은 기본 인페인팅 대신 정밀하고 지시 기반 수정을 지원하여 비주얼 AI에 혁신을 일으키고 있습니다. 이 강력한 도구는 자연어 명령과 정확한 픽셀 조작을 연결하여 이미지 일관성을 매끄럽게 유지합니다. 그러나 이러한 고급 모델을 로컬에서 실행하려면 특히 GPU VRAM과 같은 상당한 하드웨어 리소스가 필요합니다. 하위 사양 그래픽 카드를 사용하는 사용자는 지속적인 메모리 부족 시스템 크래시를 피하기 위해 특수한 GGUF 양자화 워크플로우에 의존하거나 처리를 강력한 클라우드 API로 오프로드해야 합니다. 로컬 실행을 위해 커스텀 ComfyUI 노드를 설치하거나 GPTProto 통합 API와 같은 확장 가능한 엔터프라이즈 솔루션을 활용하는 경우, 안정적이고 프로페셔널한 이미지 편집을 위해서는 설정 최적화가 필수적입니다.

Schuyler Stacy | 2026-04-02

Gemini 3 이미지 생성기: AI 아트의 미래

Gemini 3 이미지 생성기: AI 아트의 미래

TL;DR 인공지능 환경은 새로운 실험에서 전문적인 도구로 빠르게 전환되고 있습니다. 창작자들이 더 높은 정밀도와 더 깊은 맥락 이해를 요구함에 따라, 곧 출시될 Gemini 3 이미지 생성기 는 업계를 재정의할 준비가 되어 있습니다. 이 차세대 모델은 기존 AI의 지속적인 난제를 해결하여 초사실적인 비주얼, 완벽한 타이포그래피, 직관적인 멀티모달 협업을 제공할 것으로 예상됩니다. 전작의 강력한 아키텍처를 기반으로 Gemini 3 이미지 생성기는 디지털 디자인, 마케팅, 콘텐츠 제작에 대한 우리의 접근 방식을 변화시키고, 고급 예술 기법을 모든 사람이 누릴 수 있게 만들 것입니다.

Michael Johnson | 2026-03-02