curl --request POST "https://gptproto.com/v1/chat/completions" \
--header "Authorization: Bearer $GPTPROTO_API_KEY" \
--header "Content-Type: application/json" \
--data '{
"model": "glm-5.1",
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Hello"
}
]
}'Chat, Coding-Agenten und Dokumentenarbeit. Preise pro 1 Mio. Tokens – Eingabe, gecachte Eingabe und Ausgabe werden separat abgerechnet. GPTProto liegt 10% unter den offiziellen Preisen.
| Szenario | Z-AI Liste | OpenRouter | GPTProto | Du sparst / Monat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Persönlich10 Mio. Tokens / Monat (4.8 Mio. im Cache) | $14.53 | $15.33 | $13.08 | −$1.45≈ $17.43 / Jahr |
| Team100 Mio. Tokens / Monat (48 Mio. im Cache) | $145.28 | $153.27 | $130.75 | −$14.53≈ $174.34 / Jahr |
| Business500 Mio. Tokens / Monat (240 Mio. im Cache) | $726.40 | $766.35 | $653.76 | −$72.64≈ $871.68 / Jahr |
GLM-5.1 API
Use Z.ai’s open-weight coding and agent model through GPTProto with a 200K context window, pay-as-you-go token billing, and one balance for 200+ AI models.
What Is the GLM-5.1 API?
GLM-5.1 is a text-to-text foundation model released by Z.ai for agentic engineering. Rather than focusing only on one-shot code generation, it is designed for workflows that repeatedly plan, call tools, inspect results, revise an approach, and verify an outcome. Z.ai highlights agentic coding, complex instruction following, front-end development, document work, and long-horizon engineering as primary uses.
The hosted GLM-5.1 API gives applications access to the model without deploying its 754B-parameter weights. Its official specification lists a 200K-token context window and a maximum output of 128K tokens. The model also supports thinking modes, response streaming, function calling, context caching, structured output, and MCP integration. Parameter availability can differ by API route, so production integrations should use the request fields documented in the GPTProto Quick Start rather than copying an official Z.ai payload unchanged.
| Specification | GLM-5.1 |
| Developer | Z.ai |
| Model string on GPTProto | glm-5.1 |
| Input / output | Text / text |
| Context length | 200K tokens |
| Maximum output | 128K tokens |
| Published model size | 754B parameters |
| Weight license | MIT |
| Documented model capabilities | Thinking modes, streaming, function calling, context caching, structured output, MCP |
| GPTProto token price | $1.26/M input; $3.96/M output |
Where GLM-5.1 Fits Best
GLM-5.1 is most relevant when a task needs more than a single completion. A coding agent can use it to break down a repository change, inspect files through tools, implement edits, run tests, read failures, and iterate. For repo-generation work, the model can turn requirements into a multi-file project while maintaining interfaces and dependencies across the generated code. It can also support terminal-oriented workflows in which the surrounding agent—not the model alone—executes commands and returns logs for the next reasoning step.
That distinction matters: an API call does not independently browse a repository, run a shell, or change files. Your application must supply the tools, permissions, relevant context, and validation loop. Treat function calls as proposals from the model, validate arguments before execution, and return concise tool results. For high-risk changes, require tests and human review before deployment.
| Workload | Why GLM-5.1 can fit | What the application must provide |
| Multi-file coding changes | Long context and agentic engineering focus | File tools, scoped permissions, tests, rollback |
| Repository generation | Strong published NL2Repo result and long output allowance | Clear architecture, acceptance criteria, build checks |
| Terminal and debugging agents | Tool-use workflow and published Terminal-Bench evaluation | Sandboxed command execution and log return |
| Structured business workflows | Function calling and structured output support | Schema validation, retry logic, audit logging |
GLM-5.1 vs GLM-5.2: Which API Should You Use?
GLM-5.2 is the current successor and expands the context window from 200K to 1M tokens. Both versions list a maximum output of 128K, and Z.ai currently lists the same official token price for each: $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output. This makes the choice less about provider list price and more about workload requirements and model-version stability.
Choose GLM-5.1 when your prompts, tool schemas, regression tests, and expected outputs have already been evaluated against the glm-5.1 model string. Keeping the version fixed avoids introducing a behavior change during an active release. For a new project, or for project-scale repository work that can use more than 200K tokens, evaluate the GLM-5.2 API first.
| Factor | GLM-5.1 | GLM-5.2 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Maximum output | 128K | 128K |
| Input / output | Text / text | Text / text |
| Z.ai list price | $1.40/M input; $4.40/M output | $1.40/M input; $4.40/M output |
| Best reason to choose | Existing 5.1-tested workflows and fixed-version behavior | New long-context and project-scale workflows |
Open Weights or a Hosted GLM-5.1 API?
GLM-5.1 is often described as open source, but “MIT-licensed open weights” is the more precise description. Z.ai publishes the 754B-parameter model weights under the MIT license, so teams with suitable infrastructure can deploy and operate the model themselves. Self-hosting gives more control over inference infrastructure and deployment policy, but it also shifts capacity planning, serving software, monitoring, upgrades, and reliability to the operator.
Using the GLM-5.1 API is the managed alternative. GPTProto handles the hosted access and usage billing, while your application sends requests with the glm-5.1 model string. The API does not change who developed the model or the license of the downloadable weights. It changes how you obtain inference: no local weight deployment, a pay-as-you-go balance, and the option to call other integrated models through the same GPTProto account.
Practical Guidance for Reliable Agent Runs
Start with a bounded objective and an explicit definition of done. Provide only the files, interfaces, and logs needed for the current step; a 200K context limit is capacity, not a requirement to fill every request. Separate planning, editing, and verification so the model can see whether each stage succeeded before moving on.
For code changes, include repository conventions, prohibited actions, build commands, and required tests. Ask the model to identify the affected files before editing, then return tool results in a consistent format. Validate structured output against a schema and treat every proposed shell command or external action as untrusted input until your application approves it. These controls are important even when a benchmark shows strong coding performance: benchmark scores measure a defined evaluation setup, not the safety or correctness of every production call.
Z.ai reports a 58.4 score for GLM-5.1 on SWE-Bench Pro, 42.7 on NL2Repo, and 63.5 on Terminal-Bench 2.0 with Terminus-2. Use those figures as model-selection signals, then run a private evaluation with your own languages, repositories, tool definitions, latency limits, and acceptance tests before routing production traffic.
Access GLM-5.1 Through One GPTProto Key
The model string on this page is glm-5.1. When moving an existing Z.ai integration, use the authentication and base URL shown in the GPTProto Quick Start; do not leave the official Z.ai endpoint in your client. Re-test thinking-mode fields, streaming events, tool-call arguments, and structured-output handling because gateway payload support can differ.
GPTProto lists the GLM-5.1 API at $1.26 per million input tokens and $3.96 per million output tokens, 10% below Z.ai’s current list rates. The same GPTProto account and balance can also be used for the platform’s broader AI model catalog , which reduces separate provider accounts and prepaid balances when an application needs fallbacks or multiple model families.
FAQ
Wie lang ist das API-Kontextfenster von GLM-5.1?
Wie viel kostet die GLM-5.1-API bei GPTProto?
Wie erhalte ich einen GLM-5.1-API-Schlüssel?
Ist GLM-5.1 Open Source?
Unterstützt GLM-5.1 Function Calling und strukturierte Ausgaben?
Was ist der Unterschied zwischen GLM-5.1 und GLM-5.2?
Wie schneidet GLM-5.1 beim Programmieren im Vergleich zu Kimi K2.5 ab?
Kann GLM-5.1 direkt Terminalbefehle ausführen oder mein Repository bearbeiten?
Verwandte Artikel
Anleitungen, Vergleiche und Updates zu diesem Modell.
Alle Artikel
Was ist GLM 5.2? Open-Weight-Coding zum 1/6 des Preises
GLM 5.2 ist das Open-Weight-Coding-Modell von Z.ai mit MIT-Lizenz und einem Kontext von 1 Mio. Tokens. Entdecken Sie seine Funktionen, Benchmarks im Vergleich zu Claude Opus 4.8 und GPT-5.5, die Preise und wie Sie es ausführen können.

Die beste KI-API für Entwickler im Jahr 2026: 10 Plattformen im Vergleich
Vergleichen Sie OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, OpenRouter, fal.ai, Replicate und GPTProto hinsichtlich realer Preise, Modellabdeckung, Latenz, SDKs und Eignung für den Produktionseinsatz.

Was ist MiniMax M3 Pro? Alles, was wir über Chinas Modell mit 2,7 Billionen Parametern wissen
MiniMax M3 Pro: ein gemeldetes Open-Weight-Modell mit 2,7 Billionen Parametern und Ziel für das 3. Quartal 2026 – basierend auf einer einzigen Quelle. Was ist bestätigt, was ist ein Gerücht und welches MiniMax-Modell können Sie heute aufrufen?

GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5: Günstiger pro Token oder günstiger im Vertrauen? (2026)
GPT-5.6 Sol unterbietet Claude Fable 5 bei jedem Preisvergleich – doch METR hat sein Reward-Hacking angeprangert. Welches Modell Sie 2026 einsetzen, hängt davon ab, wer zusieht.